Showing posts with label Senate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Senate. Show all posts

Thursday, March 5, 2015

THE TRUE COST OF OBAMA CARE

Yesterday the SCOTUS heard the King vs. Burwell case concerning the legality of ObamaCare subsidies in states which did not establish individual coops. While the judges questioning and commentary doesn't lend itself to an indication of how they will rule in June, it was an interesting case ion which the justices went to what I consider extremes to justify their seemingly preconceived positions.
Regardless of the outcome, the bottom line is that ObamaCare is EXTREMELY BAD law EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE and doesn't begin to cut costs or solve the issue of the uninsured. Because of this it should be repealed immediately.
Here is a true estimation of the costs involved...

http://dailysignal.com/2015/…/04/damaging-effects-obamacare/

Thursday, August 9, 2012

STIMULUS PLANS AND THE RISING UNEMPLOYMENT RATE


Was discussing the “Stimulus plans failures and the rising unemployment rate" with a liberal group yesterday.  One of them made an interesting analogy from his liberal point of view:

“It's not that it "was Bush's fault, and then the Congresses fault"....to fix the kind of mess Obama inherited from his predecessor, he needs to spend money and years....it isn't something that you can fix in a year or two, and even worse, without spending anything....it's like you hire a guy to put tile on your floor, you give him a 50% deposit check, he rips out your old tile and then decides to leave without installing the new tiles he didn't even buy....the guy you're going to hire after him is going to need new tile and thin set to fix your floor, and it's going to take some time....I hope I expressed the principle clearly enough, with my example/analogy.... :-)


And here is my response:

Let's go with your spot on analogy. If you are dumb enough to hire a sketchy contractor with very few references (ie...the type who would take your money and not do the job), give him a 50% deposit, let him go to wor
k and not oversee what he is doing, you deserve the less than positive result because you are a dumbass!

But, let's apply your analogy to America today, the American people hired that sketchy contractor with no references, then we gave him a Trillion Dollars because unemployment would rise above 8% and we would all suffer tremendously if not for his "Stimulus plan".  We did and gave him full spending authority.  The Senate went and compounded the problem by giving the President unrestrained spending ability.  First, holding off passing the 2009 budget until well after Obama entered office so the budget could be tailored to him.  They then became completely derelict in their duty by not passing another budget for more than 1100 days.  Instead they passed continuing spending resolutions favoring the administrations enormous spending habits. Deficits soared!  Yet, here we are, more than 3 years later, much deeper in debt, the unemployment rate remains above the point he stated it would never reach and it is ticking higher, not lower.

So, yes my myopic friend, your analogy is very appropriate. We, the American people, do need to fire this inept contractor and replace him with one who has both the experience and references. Would prefer it were not Romney, but he does have the experience and references and is far and away a better choice than the inept contractor currently holding the office.

Based on your own analogy, voting for Obama again would just prove how much of a dumbass you really are, IMO.